On 8/1/06, John Maddock <john@johnmaddock.co.uk> wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
So... I added a 'cinclude' tag (standing for code include) to quickbook which, given a file, includes it in the documentation marked up (and colored!) appropriately. The implementation is attached. It can very well be flawed as it is basically a copy&paste of other parts of the code, but so far seems to work.
Any chance this -- or something similar -- can be integrated?
Certainly. I might need to ask for some more cinclude related features. Are you willing to do some more coding? Please email me.
Just a thought, but would it be better to make [include ] a phrase level element so it can include code or whatever, otherwise we'll end up with [cinclude ] and [pyinclude ] and [terminal_include ] and...... etc.
Note that cinclude stands for "code include", not "C include"; hence the pyinclude wouldn't exist ;-) Anyway, as Eric said it may be better to make [include] more intelligent. What about making it take two arguments, one specifying the file name and the other the format? E.g. [include somefile.xml xml] [include code.cpp c++] [include foo.qbk quickbook] The first one could make xinclude deprecated and the last one could be made to avoid the 'quickbook' extra word to preserve the current syntax. -- Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84@gmail.com> The Julipedia - http://julipedia.blogspot.com/