John Maddock wrote:
Why does configure think that the specializations are present?
I don't know, I can reproduce this, but:
* The Boost.Config test program when run on it's own fails as expected (libs/config/test/no_ll_limits_pass.cpp built with -std strict_ansi). * I've eyeballed the configure.in again, and everything looks correct.
Hmm, seems the other way round. Is this how it should be? ~/net/src/boost/boost-HEAD/libs/config> cxx -version V6.5-042 -std strict_ansi -model ansi -o conftest -I./../.. -I./../../libs/config/test -g -DBOOST_NO_CONFIG test/no_ll_limits_pass.cpp -lrt -lm schoepf@area51:~/net/src/boost/boost-HEAD/libs/config> ./conftest ; echo $? 0 ~/net/src/boost/boost-HEAD/libs/config> cxx -version V6.5-042 -std strict_ansi -model ansi -o conftest -I./../.. -I./../../libs/config/test -g -DBOOST_NO_CONFIG test/no_ll_limits_fail.cpp -lrt -lm cxx: Warning: test/boost_no_ll_limits.ipp, line 22: the type "long long" is nonstandard typedef long long llt; ----------------^ cxx: Warning: test/boost_no_ll_limits.ipp, line 26: the type "long long" is nonstandard typedef unsigned long long ullt; -------------------------^ cxx: Warning: test/boost_no_ll_limits.ipp, line 28: statement is unreachable if(0 == std::numeric_limits<ullt>::is_specialized) return -1; ---^ cxx: Warning: test/boost_no_ll_limits.ipp, line 29: statement is unreachable return 0; ---^ schoepf@area51:~/net/src/boost/boost-HEAD/libs/config> ./conftest ; echo $? 255 Markus