Hello, My apologies; I should have been less `succint`. auto_buffer is, in fact, related, inasmuch as it also attempts to use the stack for storage. However, boost::monotonic provides an allocator that means that *all* STL containers - and other ones - can use the stack for storage. Or the heap. In that respect, auto_buffer<T> is a subset of the proposed boost::monotonic::vector<T>. Regards, Christian. On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Christian Schladetsch < christian.schladetsch@gmail.com> wrote:
This is unrelated.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Francois Barel <frabar666@gmail.com>wrote:
This is the first I have heard of Thorsten Ottose's auto_buffer
Christian Schladetsch wrote: proposal.
Do you have a link to it?
I believe the last links he posted are: http://www.cs.aau.dk/~nesotto/boost/auto_buffer.zip<http://www.cs.aau.dk/%7Enesotto/boost/auto_buffer.zip> http://www.cs.aau.dk/~nesotto/boost/trunk/libs/auto_buffer/doc/html/<http://www.cs.aau.dk/%7Enesotto/boost/trunk/libs/auto_buffer/doc/html/>
Regards, François _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost