On 6/23/11 3:21 AM, Denis Shevchenko wrote:
Hello all!
I think Assign 2.0 is not simple library. It's not as technical view as just first impression.
IMO, library that designed only for simplify the filling containers *MUST* be simple.
That's a very candid assessment which I hear loud and clear, and does a very good job of summarizing the overwhelming impression. But I do think that this proposal fits with the mandate of Boost to seek code reuse, modularity, and convergence towards the C++0x standard. I have given specific arguments to that effect in previous comments. The question is, I think, whether there is sufficient ground for bringing this design and its documentation to meet the demand for greater simplicity? Thanks. PS: The example was not meant as the analogue of hello world. On the contrary, but it seems that is has baffled reviewers more than it has impressed them ;-)
- Denis _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe& other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost