----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Sutton" <asutton.list@gmail.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 6:45 PM Subject: Re: [boost] GSoC 2011 - Do we need to starting thinking about it?
I agree with you, it is better if the the proposals are limited to the *expectations*. Up to the student to make its own proposal. In this way we would be able to evaluate the motivation and capabilities of the student better.
Yes... reviewing dozens of "I will do xxx" proposals is a particularly frustrating process :)
Could the following example be enough? Boost.Thread compliance with C++0x standard ================================= Adapt the current Boost.Thread interface to the C++0x standard proposal, for C++98 and C++0x compilers. Best, Vicente