Rutger ter Borg wrote:
Ok. I am looking through the documentation of version 2, there are things I like, and some things to lesser extend, mainly because it tries to mimic Matlab. That's the design rationale of NT2. Main use case is : take a .M, get a .cpp, compile, ???, profit.
Have you considered creating a more C++-like domain-specific language, taking elements from various domain-specific languages?
We started yes. But NT2 is a two men work, so it took times. But in the end, the goal is to have a flexible code base for "optimized computation on N-D table" and plug-in domain-specific interface on top of this. My main research topic is all about that, I just need time+people ;) -- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35