12 Jan
2006
12 Jan
'06
8:57 p.m.
"Eric Niebler" <eric@boost-consulting.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Edward Diener <eddielee@tropicsoft.com> writes:
So while I have always been a supporter of Borland in the past I do not see that they are serious about fixing their compiler bugs, or even consider it important to do so.
Maybe we should move on, then. At this point they may need us more than we need them.
Discussions of "us" (Boost) and "them" (Borland) is leaving someone out: the developers who need both us /and/ them to play nice.
No developers _need_ us to play nice with Borland in 1.34. Anyone currently using Boost could stick with 1.33. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com