Re: [boost] [MSM] Is there any interest in C++14 Boost.MSM-eUML like library which compiles up to 60x quicker whilst being a slightly faster too?

Le 16/02/2016 17:44, Krzysztof Jusiak a écrit :

Yea, but that would mean that guard has to be evaluated before exit of the state or any action, so the order would be.

1. guard [to enable transition] 2. exit src state 3. actions... 4. entry dst state

When the actual state change should happen in above sequence it's not stated in the document as well.

I would assume following order according to the spec + a bit of rationality?

1. guard [to enable transition] 2. exit src state 3. actions... 4. CHANGE THE STATE TO DST HERE? 5. entry dst state

I agree. It was evident to me, but I can not point to any wording. Vicente