Re: [boost] Standalone boost::ignore_unused_variable_warning()

2014-05-19 19:26 GMT+04:00 Adam Wulkiewicz : <...>

Then probably also

boost::ignore_unused_variable(v1) ; boost::ignore_unused_variables(v1, v2, v3);

for consistency.

I'd prefer to see a single function name, not two: boost::ignore_unused_variables(v1) ; boost::ignore_unused_variables(v1, v2, v3);

Or would putting it in boost::utility/BOOST_UTILITY be a better idea?

boost::utility:: namespace looks reasonable. +1 -- Best regards, Antony Polukhin