1 Jun
2009
1 Jun
'09
9:34 p.m.
k-oli@gmx.de wrote:
Am Montag 01 Juni 2009 21:11:17 schrieb Sohail Somani:
It seems the only real difference is a future/handle which the above library also has in an experimental capacity.
AFAIK - the implementation from http://threadpool.sf.net doesn't provide a working future implementation nor does is implement work-stealing (including sub-tasking) or task interruption. Boost.Task provides this functionality (it uses the future implementation from Anthony Williams which will be part of boost soon).
Ah, thanks for clarifying. I think your statements are correct. Is boost.task being used in production yet? -- Sohail Somani http://uint32t.blogspot.com