On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:00:05 +0500, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:
Ilya Sokolov wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:20:14 +0500, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:
The implementer may declare std types with template parameters beyond those named in the standard, provided the extras are defaulted so the types work as if they didn't have the extra template parameters.
No. See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#94
I think the committee was disingenuous to declare the standard clear as written when Pete Becker got it wrong: http://bit.ly/hXpupO.
+1. Looks like 'clear as written' means something else for the committee ).
Still, that issue does prove me wrong. Thanks for the clarification.
_____ Rob Stewart robert.stewart@sig.com Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer; Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com