On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:33:51PM +0100, Paul A Bristow <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> wrote:
| -----Original Message----- | From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org | [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Chris Uzdavinis | Sent: 26 April 2006 15:10 | To: boost@lists.boost.org | Subject: Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO. | | "Olaf van der Spek" <olafvdspek@gmail.com> writes: | | >> Also, asio is not an acronym | > | > In what way is it not? | | If it were an acronym, for what word would the "s" stand? | | "Asychronous S(omething) Input Output"?
Or CIO for Chronous Input Output?
to escape from the async-ness which doesn't seem important in the bigger picture into which this library promises to fit in future?
But I still feel we can do better still...
Hm, you mean like "chronic input output"? Andreas Pokorny