Hi Andrey,
I'm not sure what exactly you are trying to convince me in. Is it that library names are irrelevant to their domain?
the truth typically lies somewhere in the middle. A descriptive project name is helpful to some degree -- yet there are plenty of projects out there that succeed admirably despite their non-descriptive names. Think "Firefox", if you like. Arguably, the name "Boost" is not excessively descriptive either. It so happens, however, that the users of these projects appear to care more about technical excellence than about names. To say that library names would be "irrelevant" is an exaggeration. The amount of attention you appear to be paying to this subject, however, is exaggerated too. Frankly, your repeated complaints about Spirit's naming decisions feel like nitpicking. I, for one, wouldn't mind if you would drop the subject now and instead spend your time, say, finalizing the Boost.Log library? Logging seems to be a controversial subject. I will be a lot of effort to get your code past the review. Take care, Peter