Re: [boost] [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st

On Saturday 01 November 2008 16:27, Frank Mori Hess wrote:

As requested earlier by Vincent, I threw together a little benchmark program (attached) comparing the speed of boost.signals with signals2. It produces the following output on a P4 running Linux:

boost::signals2::signal, 10 connections, invoking 1000000 times: 0.77 s

boost::signal, 10 connections, invoking 1000000 times: 0.91 s

Oops, there was an error in the benchmark program, the above two times for 10 untracked connections were reversed. The 0.77s time belongs to boost::signal, and the 0.91s time is boost::signals2::signal.