Re: [boost] property tree library not in CVS?

Jeff Garland said: (by the date of Thu, 05 Oct 2006 06:34:00 -0700)

As I've done in the past, I'll really encourage you *not* wait to finish the docs to put the code in CVS. To help us avoid a repeat of 1.34 we need libraries going into 1.35 to be in CVS and regression tested as early in the cycle as possible. New authors tend to underestimate the amount of time/effort to resolve porting issues -- the key fact that there is often a 24 hour wait to see if fixes actually resolve issues.

Good point! Marcin, please put your code in CVS, so that you can fix the regression tests, and finish docs later! -- Janek Kozicki |