On 4/28/06, Paul A Bristow <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> wrote:
| -----Original Message----- | From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org | [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Silex | Sent: 26 April 2006 16:38 | To: boost@lists.boost.org | Subject: Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO. | | libio ? | ionet ? | | :) | | On 4/26/06, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote: | > But if the plan is to also provide synchronous I/O, | then the name should be broadened, IMO.
fario ?
iofar?
(io to places not so local and yet not covered by filesystem - perhaps networked).
i see nothing wrong with asio but assuming that is out the door what's wrong with something simple like boost.io?
Paul
-- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB Phone and SMS text +44 1539 561830, Mobile and SMS text +44 7714 330204 mailto: pbristow@hetp.u-net.com http://www.hetp.u-net.com/index.html http://www.hetp.u-net.com/Paul%20A%20Bristow%20info.html
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Cory Nelson http://www.int64.org