3 Nov
2011
3 Nov
'11
1:51 p.m.
Den 03-11-2011 13:16, Olaf van der Spek skrev:
If you can find it, I might believe you. It should be in the archieves from some years ago.
I meant the discussion last month. Didn't know it was discussed before. Do you have any idea in what year/month?
A couple of years maybe. I think it happened at the same time we demanded that size(Rng) only worked for RandomAccessRanges and that this function also returns a signed type. Using the old docs, one can probably track down the approximate time. The bottom line is that it was a deliberate decision. The example put forward std::min(bbb.size(), (size_t)arr.size()); is not portable either. -Thorsten