I'm not certain it actually does cause a problem. I'd have to check, but doesn't the standard technically just specify the behavior of the expression your_container.size(), etc., not that the functions must be non-static? You can still do your_array.size() or your_array.empty(), etc. even though the functions are static to the class. On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:33 AM, herve martin <hervemart1@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I guess that the static qualifier for size(), empty() and max_size() makes the boost::array template class unsuitable for the STL sequence container interface. I recommend to remove the static qualifier.
Anyone agrees with me ?
best regards, herve _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- -Matt Calabrese