27 Jul
2005
27 Jul
'05
5:54 p.m.
I'm not sure I quite understand what you are asking for here...could you give an example? On 7/28/05, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld@sympatico.ca> wrote:
What would make such a tool even more useful than a replacement for 'gcc -M' would be if it could generate dependencies for sets of files, i.e. with the possibility of internal caching such that it doesn't have to reparse a file twice if not necessary. But that may require quite some work, for example to determine a 'state' dependent on values of all the defined macros.
Regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost