Re: [boost] [rangelib]Any interest or plans for boost review?

Larry Evans <cppljevans <at> cox-internet.com> writes:

I suspect I missed something, but it's not obvious, at least to me :(

1. range_iterator<X> is nothing but a metafunction for an iterator. it returns an iterator type. period. So there is no i.empty() that makes sense. 2. the range lib does not have support for "for_each-style iteration". use Eric's FOREACH macro for that. br Thorsten