Tim Blechmann wrote:
So, it appears we've arrived at the following list of issue with the current official arrangement. - sandbox is physically different SVN repository, - handling cross-dependencies between sandbox libraries require full branches, as opposed to just boost/X + libs/X layout - getting SVN access is hard (in your opinion)
actually, i am not interested in using the sandbox svn for development ... so i don't care how hard it is to get an svn account ...
- git makes you, personally, more productive
among other issues, because subversion doesn't support local branches and subversion's `svn merge' is nowhere near the power of `git merge' (not to speak of `git rebase')
I guess these are points that are hard to discuss without getting into highly subjective matters like which features of merge operation are important — not to mention that such matters are offtopic here.
Is that correct understanding?
more or less :)
Thanks, then I've learned what I wanted to know. - Volodya