3 May
2006
3 May
'06
7:01 p.m.
Doug Gregor wrote: [...]
I realize that this in itself could be considered a reason for the test to fail. What do you think? Maybe this patch could be applied to the RC_1_34_0 branch only and not to head.
Actually, this test is intended to fail on compilers that don't support the standard syntax. It should be identical to signal_n_test, which uses the more portable, alternative syntax. So, I'd rather not apply this patch. We should instead mark this as an expected failure in the regression test results.
Fine by me. Cheers, Nicola Musatti