I'm very, very concerned that there are only a very few reviews (actually really just one !!!). In the past I've railed against the acceptance of libraries with only two reviews !!! I don't really know what else to say about this. I'll just punt to the review manager.
I think the problem is this: normally we review largely based on interface and the design - get the design right and the internals usually take care of themselves. However, in this case the design is (hopefully) exceptionally uncontroversial - it looks like an int, smalls like an int, and behaves like an int. There really isn't much to get your teeth into there. What really matters is that: * It's functionally correct. * It truly is a drop in replacement for type int, with no nasty surprises. * It's performance compared to int isn't so dreadful that no one uses it. Unfortunately reviewing these points requires some exceptionally detailed work: the internals of the library are sufficiently complex, and use enough unfamiliar (to me at least) C++14 features, that this is not an easy task. I confess at present to be deeply surprised at how complex the internals are... Best, John. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com