22 Jun
2012
22 Jun
'12
8:40 p.m.
Dave Abrahams wrote:
on Fri Jun 22 2012, Daniel James <dnljms-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
There are a lot of headers violating your rule.
Most notably, there are plenty of aggregate headers that do this.
In a previous post, I specifically excluded "convenience headers" from being considered as "violating" this "rule". They are not at issue here. Robert Ramey