
25 May
2006
25 May
'06
9:54 p.m.
Vincent Bherer-Roy wrote:
On 5/25/06, AlisdairM <alisdair.meredith@uk.renaultf1.com> wrote:
I have been thinking this over all day, and think another class is the most sensible solution - even if it means duplicating the implementation. The extra boolean value in the type is just too ugly! Open to suggestions on a name though, other than array2 or arrayex <g>
Brainstorm:
constructible_array static_vector
Boost.Array don't have a maintainer. So I think there is an open spot. -Thorsten