-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 19 May 2008 22:26 pm, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
My bad. I was thinking more about the "validity" of default constructed futures that don't have an associated promise. I was under the impression that there wasn't a way to create a future without an existing promise object. So something like:
future<int>();
Would introduce an either invalid future whose value could not ever be set through an associated promise.
Futures are assignable, so a default constructed future could later be assigned a future that does have an associated promise. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIMtME5vihyNWuA4URAgTkAJ403TL2L+1Lu3tMdWfcpQ5fzt5lOACfc2yK LXZZ2iPdpmDBKeisWaIS7bY= =efEN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----