On 9/5/12 11:33 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
I'm not sure. To me, I think it's easier to simply avoid result_of on C++11 and just use decltype directly. Problem solved. Why use an inferior tool when something better is available anyway?
In the case where you need an overload to drop out because of the ill-formed-ness of a call expression, I agree with you. If you mean to swear off using result_of entirely because of this issue, then you'd be making your code non-portable for no good reason.
How so? I can keep using result_of in '03 code and use decltype in '11 code. I see no reason how that will be non-portable. PS> If you stop acting like the police, perhaps more people will stop behaving like renegades ;-) Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com