15 Mar
2011
15 Mar
'11
11:41 a.m.
Thomas Heller wrote:
WRT naming i think we should strive for consistent naming in overall boost, not just the type_traits library. Proto, for example, names the operators as well, as does Boost.Operator. FWIW both libraries agree on left_shift/right_shift.
Please take that into consideration.
+1 The following list of names from Proto looks quite good to me, and doesn't seem to contain any "odd sounding" names like "operator_plus_equal" <http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_1/doc/html/proto/users_guide.html#boost_proto.users_guide.intermediate_form.tags_and_metafunctions> Regards, Thomas