On 9 October 2012 17:10, Christian Henning <chhenning@gmail.com> wrote:
I wonder, why the definitions of interleaved_ptr [1] and and interleaved_ref [2] are provided as examples, instead of included as part of the Boost.GIL API?
IMO, these make useful general-purpose utility and it could be easily copied into <boost/gil/utilities.hpp>, couldn't it? Or, into official set of Boost.GIL extensions, at least.
[1] http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/release/libs/gil/example/interleaved_ptr.hpp [2] http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/release/libs/gil/example/interleaved_ref.hpp
I would suggest to add them to the upcoming toolbox. I'll have a look.
Christian, That would be great. Toolbox sounds like the right place for that. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net