Dean Michael Berris wrote:
Right now I'm thinking maybe this should be a separate library (or a small utility class) that builds upon or depends on Boost.Function.
That's cool too. A thorough review will be a nice exercise and a good experience for those how haven't undergone the spine-chilling adventure yet ;-) It's better than a bungee jumping, promise! :-P
However, if Doug (or Joel, and everybody else) thinks otherwise, and that this should be merged into Boost.Function as an overload extension, that would be acceptable as well.
Doug's the boss here. Ultimately, he'll decide on that route.
Either way, we still need to write documentation and more tests, so in the meantime I'd love to get this (and the documentation) into the sandbox so that others can play around with it as well.
Thanks, Dean, Marco and Marco and all else for your work on this! Amazing folks! Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net