I think utility would be fine. Concurrent Programming is in my opinion too "restrictive". On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Daniel James <daniel_james@fmail.co.uk>wrote:
On 26/07/2008, Emil Dotchevski <emil@revergestudios.com> wrote:
Thanks Daniel!
Actually, I am not sure what's the best category for this library. It's a low level lib, so perhaps it should go under utility, miscellaneous doesn't seem descriptive enough. Any thoughts?
I'm really not sure. Possibly 'Programming Interfaces'? Maybe also 'Concurrent Programming', although that might be stretching it.
Daniel _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Alp Mestan --- http://blog.mestan.fr/ --- http://alp.developpez.com/ --- In charge of the Qt, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence sections on Developpez