9 Oct
2005
9 Oct
'05
9:16 p.m.
PS: my results for RTL (MinGW with optimization) --3094ms. My PC has a 1.5 GHz processor.
I should warn you both that gcc's ability to optimize RML is quite poor. I had to move to gcc 4.0.1 to get decent performance. VC7.1 does a much better job, which is where my number came from. I also don't really understand the purpose of this "benchmark". The test itself does nothing useful other than to probe the index 1000000 times. It would be better with a real-life problem. Calum