On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:13 PM, John Maddock wrote:
On 18/02/2014 18:57, Peter Dimov wrote:
John Maddock wrote:
Too little:
The headers under boost/config/ are included via macros so aren't placed in the dependency graph. I can fix this easily enough in the Boost.Config tests, but ideally this should be fixed at the top level by making everything under boost/config/ a dependency of boost/config.hpp.
You can fix that from your side - if you're so inclined - by including the omitted headers in an #if 0 block to enable the scanner to see them.
Currently a number of tests seems to be failing due to a missing config/user.hpp, so it's a real problem. But there's also something else that is wrong with the headers, as other tests seem to be using older header versions, and that doesn't seem to be caused by a missed dependency.
I see that as well - there are quite a number of failures in the Math lib tests which I simply do not see locally (and a few of us have tried to reproduce). There are frankly too many to try and track down one at a time by pestering the test-runners: who probably have better things to do anyway. Frankly it's all rather discouraging :-(
I can try to help if you can point me to any unexpected (non-reproducible) problem with either Sandia tester (Mac or Linux)?