Re: [boost] [move][container] Review Request (new versions of Boost.Move and Boost.Container in sandbox and vault)

Jeffrey Hellrung escribió:

I would prefer it as is, but I haven't had a need for iterator stability. I thought the point of a flat_map/flat_set was to be an as-lightweight-as-possible generic associative container, but still with reasonable (O(log n)) lookup time.

Perhaps a policy-based approach is possible, or an entirely separate class, e.g., stable_flat_xxx?

Yes, I was thinking about an entirely separate class.

- Jeff

Best, Ion