8 Nov
2004
8 Nov
'04
2:01 p.m.
John Torjo wrote:
No comments of the code itself, however I'm not a fan of rng as a namespace, I keep reading Random Number Generator. helpfully though I can't think of an alternative!
range (likely to conflict?) irange (likely to be used as a variable name in place of 'i' ?) irl (not good either) rangelib (too long?)
Tradition would dictate "ranges"
I'm fine with ranges:: namespace, although I find it a little big (containing too many chars).
I prefer descriptive names, and everyone is free to declare a namespace alias in his own code... namespace br = boost::ranges; Greetings, Roland
Best, John