8 Oct
2015
8 Oct
'15
2:03 p.m.
Artyom Beilis wrote:
We can create a "Separate" codecvt library with its own formal review and it would be ready in best case in a year...
One option is to put it into utility; another is to use a mini-review if the new codecvt library is an implementation of the standard <codecvt> interface. std::codecvt_utf8 is not quite the same as boost::utf8_codecvt_facet, but on the other hand, from your previous message it seems that your utf8_codecvt_facet is not std::codecvt_utf8 but std::codecvt_utf8_utf16, or perhaps it's the latter when wchar_t is 16 bit and the former when it's 32 bit.