Steven Watanabe-4 wrote
AMDG
On 06/21/2012 07:16 AM, Larry Evans wrote:
On 05/22/12 15:34, Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
I'd like to request a formal review of the TypeErasure library that I've posted about several times before here. [snip] Online documentation can be found here: http://steven_watanabe.users.sourceforge.net/type_erasure/libs/type_erasure/
The page:
*/libs/type_erasure/doc/html/boost_typeerasure /concept.html#boost_typeerasure.concept.concept_map
with section title, "Concept Maps", seems to be about specializing a builtin concept. I don't see anything in that section about a map.
a) This applies to any concept, not just builtin ones. b) "Concept Map" is the concept term for specialization.
I don't know if what is behind your "Concept Map" couldn't be renamed to Signature Map as I guess that you are mapping only signatures, and not types or data members. Am I missing something? Best, Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Formal-Review-Request-TypeErasure-tp46303... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.