10 Oct
2005
10 Oct
'05
7:23 p.m.
On Oct 10, 2005, at 6:48 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
The only thing I'm missing here is why the serialization library itself has to be modified to support all this. It seems that all this could easily be encapulated in one (or more) separate optional headers. This would be the best of all possible worlds.
It seems we are very close to a consensus. I agree with you that above would be the ideal solution. I believe that I fully understand now where the one or two small issues are that prevent this ideal solution, but as I said I want to explain this in detail when I'm awake. Matthias