10 Jun
2007
10 Jun
'07
11:25 p.m.
Robert Ramey wrote:
We have a well defined structure. It may not be optimal - but that's another issue. As far as I'm concerned, SVN vs CVS totally separate from Beman's proposal. Given all the opportunities/issues raised by a move to SVN, maybe the change to SVN should be postponed until Beman's proposal is impemented.
No ! Since, as you say, the SVN <-> CVS change is orthogonal to the rest, and since changing structure is *much* more easy in SVN, there is no reason not to start with the SVN move. Regards, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...