Hi Rob, ----- Mensaje original ----- De: Rob Stewart <stewart@sig.com> Fecha: Lunes, Abril 12, 2004 11:17 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] Re: Re: [indexed_set] revised naming proposal
From: =?windows-1252?Q?JOAQUIN_LOPEZ_MU=3FZ?= <joaquin@tid.es>
De: Rob Stewart <stewart@sig.com>
[index_list naming] Now that I am, what about changing it to "indexes" or "indices" according to your preference? IOW, I don't think "list" needs to be part of the name at all. That name works fine regardless of whether it is elaborated.
It does not look bad, actually. But I'm really trying to narrow the target down now. Do you have strong objections to index_list? Nobody else complained. [moving into boost::container]
Well, it's all about not wasting effort. Hopefully, some other boosters (and the authors of container libraries in Boost) will jump in and express themselves for a
That will be ideal. I wasn't paying attention, but has this been addressed in a separate thread with an appropriate subject in order to garner their involvement?
No. I don't feel like rising the noise level more than now by beginning a new thread. IMHO, it's unlikely that this will get any more attention (and it could be that it does not deserve it after all.) [philosophical discussion about convenience of 1st level namespaces] (excuse my snipping) Well, just for the record, what's your "vote" about pushing/not pushing into boost:container? It is not clear to me which side you're a supporter of. So far, noone has expressed any strong opinion on either option. (btw, thanks for involving into this discussion) Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo