7 May
2006
7 May
'06
2:42 p.m.
Hi again, It would be very cool if fusion::pair would be compatible with mpl::pair, so that MPL's "first" and "second" metafunctions work... Maybe the names of the type members in "mpl::pair" should be changed from "first/second" to "first_type/second_type", because then 1. "std::pair" could be used with MPL and Fusion (*), 2. "fusion::pair" could be used with MPL, and 3. "mpl::pair" could be used as a Fusion pair, if no runtime data is required (*) in place of a fusion::pair and not as an "adapted sequence". Regards, Tobias