21 Nov
2007
21 Nov
'07
2:18 a.m.
Eric Niebler wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
Eric Niebler wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
In fact I think that fusion should provide function objects for every one of its algorithm. That used to be the case at one point. I'll re-consider this again. I'll second the motion. Ok. I'll do it after 1.35 is branched. What's a good subnamespace to put that in? We already have result_of::xxx.
fusion::functional ?
That was my first thought. However, fusion has a "functional" module -- the one with fuse/unfuse and dispatch to function/function objects. This might cause confusion (no pun intended :-)). I'm CC'ing Tobias. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net