3 May
2005
3 May
'05
4:37 p.m.
"Eric Niebler" wrote:
BOOST_FOR_EACH ... Is there a compelling reason to omit the second underline?
I don't think there's a /compelling/ reason, but here's my thought process:
* This isn't an algorithm, so I don't want to evoke std::for_each. * It's like a new keyword, and some other languages have "foreach" as a keyword.
Anyway, I'm not married to the name, and I'd gladly change it if people preferred to type an extra underscore. :-)
No, please. I'd rather like to know whether I can do a #define FOREACH(...) BOOST_FOREACH(...) in my code. /Pavel