11 Sep
2012
11 Sep
'12
6:22 a.m.
On Saturday 08 September 2012 22:34:30 you wrote:
Ok, here is my second take on this. I've attached a patch with my changes.
1. I moved the guidelines to a separate section in order not to clutter the formal result_of description. 2. I seperately outlined the C++11 and C++03 recommendations. 3. I left the result_of examples. I think they illustrate the result_of usage quite well, but I'll be happy if someone comes up with something better. 4. I rephrased some of the wording about result<> usage, in response to Jeffrey's reply.
Comments are welcome.
Any comments? Daniel?