"Terje Slettebø" <tslettebo@broadpark.no> wrote in message news:044f01c4adf0$ab9fcf30$0300000a@pc...
From: "John Maddock" <john@johnmaddock.co.uk> Me too.
BTW, don't get too hung up on names it could be a bicycle shed issue again :-)
Don't worry; we have, after all, working code, and the naming issue is not what is most important.
FWIW I have been reading the previous discussion and found the function style filters , whatever v. interesting, but Possibly like others I havent really got any constructive suggestions.... I am just voyuerising. Most important thing seems to be the pragmatic one... compile times, and that the mechanisms involved in the library may turn out to be as useful as the end result. The big question (Which I hope will be dicussed at the next big C++ meeting?) is what will compiler authors make of Concepts with a big C. IOW Are they ever going to be practical. (It seems that decltype, which IMO Everyone wants, too may need similar heavyweight speculative instantiation,backout etc.) The library here certainly has some flavour of something to focus those discussions on. regards Andy Little