On 05/26/2014 01:36 PM, feverzsj wrote:
There is
convert(Converter const&)
It'll probably clash with
convert(TypeIn const&) that's why I suggested using two names(conv_to and convert) in the first place. The implementation could also be effectively simplified.
Ah, sorry. I missed that. There've been quite a few suggestions regarding the name in particular, regarding the signature and all. I feel overwhelmed. I feel, no matter what I choose, I'll end up defending it... and I am running out of ammunition. :-) There are only two ways that I can see how to proceed 1) I say "I do it my way" but then it makes it my library rather than Boost library and I am uncomfortable doing that; 2) try and unify all the input so far into a coherent requirements specs, have it voted and proceed implementing it... Oh, there is a third way out of this tight spot -- this proposal gets rejected... and all gets peaceful and quiet again... I love peace and quiet... :-)