Eric Niebler wrote:
It's not totally unmaintained, but your point is a fair one and I'm surprised nobody responded. Before we could consider switching to something like ryppl and cmake, it needs to be proven *and* there needs to some folks (plural) committed to maintaining it long-term. To that end, I'm throwing my hat in the ring. I'll be moving to Boston for the summer to help Dave turn ryppl/cmake into a viable alternative. Dave and I are both here for the long-term and are deeply invested in making Boost just work.
Also, KitWare has donated one man-month over the next year to helping make this happen. They'll add any features to CMake/CTest/CDash/CPack we deem necessary.
Just askign around. Can't ryppl be CVS agnostic ? or at least support stuff like Mercurial and Bazaar as an option ? It seems counterproductive to be tied to git for the distribution part. -- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35