Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?

On 13. Nov 2017, at 17:26, Daniel Frey via Boost wrote:

...

On 13. Nov 2017, at 15:20, Beman Dawes via Boost wrote:

Peter Sommerlad, committee member and C++Now presenter who often proposes additions to fill in holes in the standard library, asked me:

Are you aware of anybody who tried to provide a boost::operators style of automatically providing additional operators with a single base class that through SFINAE injects all possible operators based on the ones defined in the template parameter? This won't give you the control of the current boost::operators, but would be much easier to teach.

I'm the current maintainer of Boost.Operators and I heard about anyone working on that.

Above sentence is missing a "haven't": I haven't heard of anyone working on that.