Re: [boost] [optional] New RC_1_34_0 regression

3 Apr 2007

      AMDG

Richard Smith <richard <at> ex-parrot.com> writes:
...
I've just found what I believe to be a new regression on the
boost RC_1_34_0 branch relative to the 1.33.1 release.  The
example below is a simplified extract of some real world
where the behaviour of boost::none silently changes.
<snip>
Doesn't internal linkage in headers have the same
problem as unnamed namespaces?  Is there some reason
we can't use

namespace boost {
namespace detail { struct none_helper {}; };
typedef int (*none_t)(none_helper);
inline int none(none_helper) {}
}

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe