21 Jan
2014
21 Jan
'14
12:44 p.m.
On 20 Jan 2014 at 19:48, Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
BTW, if the author would have referred to http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3747.pdf, all these misunderstandings could have been avoided...
That's a good paper, but I wish it didn't claim to be a *universal* model for asynchronous operations because that model is completely unsuitable for persistent storage i/o. I had that argument with Nicholas @ Microsoft Research actually, and I think I may well have persuaded him as they're seeing the same problems of fit. Niall -- Currently unemployed and looking for work in Ireland. Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/